What states will follow California after marijuana is legalized?
Anybody know what the odds of that happening would be?
Anybody know what the odds of that happening would be?
Medical Marijuana is advancing in Illinois. Check out the latest story from NY Times: SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — The... Read More »
Kansas appeals court addresses medical marijuana issue for travelers March 15. By TONY RIZZO. The Kansas City Star.... Read More »
Foxborough Needs to Establish Medical Marijuana District Following AG's Ruling “Unless somebody can articulate something specific I think... Read More »
idk but it would probably suck. if the government controlled marijuana, they would be able to tax it ridiculously high. the would also be able to cultivate it and control how much THC is in it.
well, if California legalizes it, then Colorado will be next, but the plans for Colorado is to wait till 2012, and vote, but if California doesn’t do it, the chances of Colorado doing so are slim.
Right now, it’s looks like it’s about 50/50 for Proposition 19 passing. I would like to see it passed, but I have lived in California long enough to know that things like this are rarely a slam dunk (look what happened with gay marriage).
People erroneously think that California is this big hippy bastion where anything goes, when actually, there are as many hard core conservatives in the state as hard core liberals.
To answer you, I honestly think Oregon or Washington would have been the first states to legalize it. It’s going to be on Oregon’s ballot in November, 2012. There was a petition circulating in Washington to get it on the November ballot, but with a late start, proponents failed to get enough signatures. They promise to be back next year.
Whether it passes or not, it is still illegal on a federal level. Currently, the Obama administration has said they will not prosecute for anyone using or possessing within state laws. But, that could change at any time, and you have to remember that Obama will not be in office forever. The next President may decide to rescind that policy, and start forcing states to adhere to federal laws. And, let’s not even get into how this may very likely increase the unemployment rate since companies can still fire you for having it in your system.
But, which state will follow? Probably the other two on the left coast. It’s not called the “left” cost just because it’s on the left side of the map.
*EDIT* – @Charlie: Apparntly you never heard about Gonzales v. Raich (previously Ashcroft v. Raich), 545 U.S. 1 (2005). This was a Supreme Court case about the federal government going after a medical marijuana user in California. Read up on this case, then come back and tell us that the federal government will not go after people that are using it legally by state law.
Alcohol, tobacco, and prescription drugs (as in your example of Vicodin) are legal by federal law, but with many restrictions. Marijuana, whether for medicinal, industrial, or recreational use is not legal by federal law.
That’s a tough call. Maybe Colorado or some other west coast states.
Mutt, the federal government is never going to go after people if states legalize it. They don’t have any money, they’re not going after medical marijuana patients, and companies only drug test people because it’s illegal. Companies are not going after people for their alcohol, tobacco, and Vicodin. Besides, more and more Americans are supporting marijuana legalization, so it wouldn’t be a good political move to waste money going after what most of America sees at worst some hippies over in California. State legalization seems like the best plan to me.
EDIT: Mutt, I understand that the federal government can go after Californians that use it, and they occasionally do, but they can’t keep up. For every dispensary that they raid, a hundred more pop up in its place. They’re powerless. The same would likely be the case for Prop 19, if it passes. I think that especially since, if it passes, Californians directly voted this in, most Americans would support not going after people, and so we wouldn’t see the necessary effort from the feds to have a significant effect.
With Vicodin I was talking about drug testing. Once/if Prop 19 gets underway, especially if other states follow in its footsteps, I’d predict that many companies (probably mostly smaller ones at first) that have drug testing for their employees will stop testing for THC. That’s just what I would think/hope.
Probably more liberal states like New York.
The odds of it happening right now is probably still slim, unfortunately. LOTS of people are still uneducated by marijuana and it’s benefits. A lot of dispensaries in my area are being taken down because the conservatives just don’t like it. Take Proposition 8 as an example.