Chris Conrad on Prop 19.mov
Prop 19 explained by Chris Conrad, Author and Court-qualified Cannabis Expert Witness
Prop 19 explained by Chris Conrad, Author and Court-qualified Cannabis Expert Witness
Medical Marijuana is advancing in Illinois. Check out the latest story from NY Times: SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — The... Read More »
Kansas appeals court addresses medical marijuana issue for travelers March 15. By TONY RIZZO. The Kansas City Star.... Read More »
Foxborough Needs to Establish Medical Marijuana District Following AG's Ruling “Unless somebody can articulate something specific I think... Read More »
@metaZen Don’t hitch your personal anti-corporate agenda to cannabis legalization. A corporation provides the internet service that let you post that message, so it’s a little two faced to argue against their existence online. Many cannabis dispensaries are non-profit corporations. Once metazen gets rid of his car, bank account, phone, credit cards, utilities, grow stores, etc., send me a post card about how great life is without corporations. I just want legal cannabis, so I voted Yes on 19.
just because the word “corporation” is not in the prop doesn’t mean that investors with large bank rolls won’t try to corner the market and eliminate Mom and Pop producers… a vote for 19 is basically a vote for Wal-mart style business practices in the MJ industry and a slap in the face of all the people who have provided for you up to this point…
@ChrisConradHemp I am NOT talking about personal use tax. I am talking about “recovering the tricombs” which takes large amounts of cannabis. A tax for “dealer” amounts would be the amount needed for personal cancer treatment.Also revamping capitalism is not the issue. The issue is monopoly as Henry Georgists and Binary economists understand. In hard economic times RENT goes up and wages and interest goes DOWN showing that it is monopoly and not capital that is the evil here.
@paulagloria You’re mixing issues; This is not an attempt to revamp capitalism. Prop 19 legalizes personal adult cultivation, possession, transportation and sharing. It does not authorize taxes on personal use. If passed, dealers gain the right to seek a lawful license issued at the local level, or the legislature can adopt statewide rules. As a businessman, I pay my taxes, so why should dealers should be tax exempt? Contribute, play by the rules: Reap the harvest. Vote yes on 19.
Should the rights of dealers outweigh the rights of consumers not be criminalized or pay inflated prices? I don’t think people should be subject to arrest or fines or be subjected to discrimination or stigma in society to keep dealers afloat. Dealers could go legit, if they want to maintain their livelihoods. Get permitted. Pay taxes like the rest of us. Full repeal sounds great, but is not feasible politically. Prop. 19 will start to end of prohibition. Everyone will benefit if it passes.
what about the rights of dealers? How do you get the best oil if freedom of the market is restricted? The entire labor theory of value is wrong….with wider capital ownership distributed underutilized capacity can be utilized and become far far more effective than taxing a plant that everybody should have access to as an inalienable right. Less is unconstitutional – the prisons will stay full and the cancer wards will not empty as they easily could with simply repealing the prohibition.
Much needed clarification at this critical time! Thank you Chris Conrad for your many long years of amazing work for the entire cannabis community! Bless you, One Love! ♥
Let’s win this one people. This is the front lines. People have been working decades on this. Now’s the time for us all to push together. They’re going to push back. We can do this if we all work in unison, forget about all our differences and self interests (i.e. dispensaries opposing). Cannabis is about making a better world!
GIVE ‘EM HELL CHRIS THANKS FOR TELLING EM LIKE IT IS!
Well said (as always) Chris! I was most pleased to see our Gubernator sign rather than veto SB 1449. A small step toward redemption for vetoing the agricultural hemp bill, eh?
@jason420jason 2b7 and 2b8 both refer to the statutes that include cultivation, HS11362.5 and 11362.7, as being exempt. Qualified patients are a protected group thanks to Prop 215 and SB 420, and nothing in Prop 19 specifies any change in their legal status. Prop 19 creates a bigger tent for adults 21 and up who are immune from arrest for an ounce or a 25 sq’ garden, but patients reserve their unique legal standing for collectives, etc.
1 month away! Nice ponytail!
You claim that med pot cultivators rights are protected in Section 2b8 of Prop 19. But this section is about the rights of CITIES, not med pot users (that’s 2b7 – which excludes mention of cultivation).
The larger reality is that Cannabis is not dangerous and should not be treated as if people are growing Plutonium in their basements. The cities love Prop19 mainly because they hope it will put money into their underfunded pension programs at the expense of the dumb stoners the they hope vote for Prop19. My advice: Vote No and work on MERP and CCHH. That will end it for good and Chris will make no more money providing affirmative defense after they have been robbed of their crops,
@aolthof007 The proponents of the campaign, the official opponents of the campaign, the Riverside County Counsel and the attorney who argued SB 420 before the Cal Supreme Court all agree that patients will be protected. Contrary to your statement patients can already be taxed (have you bought at a dispensary lately?), show me a law that says they are exempt. But Prop 19 bans discrimination, so a prohibitive tax is not authorized. See Prop 19 § HS11304
We don’t agree that MMJ patients are protected. In fact when it comes to growing MJ patients will lose their rights in favor of big business because cities will be able to impose very large taxes. Citites are already drafting regulations that will impose taxes that are so high nobody could possibly afford to pay the tax. MMJ patients are not exempt and Chris neglected to metion this. This will cause more underground growing and distribution.
@ChrisConradHemp The fact that the hemp seed contains a perfect ratio of nutrients and oils for the human diet tells me that both cannabis and humans have already co-evolved for many millions of years.
For one species to evolve naturally can take only a few thousand years, or in the case of the Russian fox breeding program, only a few decades, but for TWO species to evolve with such incredible biological symbiosis tells you that this is not something that just happened over the weekend…